跳到正文
认知
返回认知精选
认知精选AI论文大约 2 小时前
单一来源当前只有一个可用来源,尚未完成多源交叉核验

Qistas: A Pre-Registered, Portable Protocol for Fairness Evaluation of Large Language Models

arXiv:2610.40893v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fairness benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) are overwhelmingly English-born and American in their social categories; translated versions carry those categories into societies where they do not apply, and almost none fix their hypotheses before the models are run. We present Qistas (Arabic qistas, "the just balance"), a protocol for evaluating how LLMs treat the social, confessional, and regional constituencies of a society, portable across countries and instantiated first for Iraq. In its pilot form it measures only what needs no verdict on contested truth: procedural symmetry across matched counterfactual pairs, differential refusal, stereotype reliance under ambiguity, and terminological framing of documented events. Every measurement is paired by construction and analysed with paired machinery (sign-flip permutation tests, exact McNemar tests, template-clustered bootstrap intervals, Holm-corrected families), with a power analysis that states, before any data exist, the smallest effect each axis can detect after the design effect of template clustering. We release the authoring apparatus (a pruned 3x5 taxonomy with four cells closed by design, per-type checklists, a cumulative rulings log, a structural audit, and a human review notebook) and report its first field test: a semantic review of a 58-item seed bank in which 24 of 25 template groups failed at least one check. The defect patterns it exposed (evaluation criteria leaking into prompts, token-level swaps that break Arabic agreement, epistemically unbalanced pairs, single-theme refusal probes, unwritten dialect twins counted as coverage) are, we argue, general hazards of counterfactual fairness benchmarks. This is a protocol paper, not a results paper: no model has been evaluated, and the accompanying pre-registration commits the hypotheses, metrics, exclusion rules, and analysis plan that the pilot will follow.

Evidence

来源与证据

单一来源 · 1 个信源

当前仅有一个可用来源,尚未完成多源交叉核验。

发布时间
内容处理
AI 翻译 / 摘要,需结合原文核对
内容有误或来源失效?告诉我们
英文原文AI论文

Unsupervised Feature Selection Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionality -- Extended Version

arXiv:2610.40736v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High dimensionality degrades both the efficiency and the effectiveness of learning algorithms, and in many applications no class labels are available to guide dimensionality reduction. This paper proposes LIDFS, an unsupervised feature selection method

4单一来源
英文原文AI论文

Certified Behavioral Retention for Continual Adaptation with Held-Out Anchors

arXiv:2610.40740v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continual adaptation requires deciding not only how to update a model, but whether to commit an update without exceeding a declared budget for changes to protected behavior. We introduce Certified Anchor-Based Adaptation (CABA), a candidate-agnostic po

3单一来源
英文原文AI论文

Bayesian Distribution System State Estimation with Flow Matching

arXiv:2610.40728v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medium-voltage feeders have few real-time measurements, so distribution system state estimation (DSSE) rests on pseudo-measurements of the secondary substations, a prior in Bayesian terms. Weighted least squares keeps the power flow exact but reduces t

3单一来源
英文原文AI论文

Don't Just Impute, Detect: Task-Aware Diffusion Pipelines for Edge Anomaly Detection

arXiv:2610.40732v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) edge pipelines routinely lose contiguous blocks of multi-sensor data to network dropouts and hardware faults. The standard remedy is a disjointed "impute-then-detect" pipeline whose imputer is trained only for Mean

3单一来源

每天早上收到这 5 条

免注册,填邮箱即可;每封邮件都能一键退订。

提交即表示同意按隐私说明保存你的邮箱,只用于发送简报。

或用 RSS 订阅

AI 翻译、摘要和解读仅用于辅助判断;涉及重要决策时,请回到上方来源核实。