跳到正文
认知
返回认知精选
认知精选AI论文大约 13 小时前
单一来源当前只有一个可用来源,尚未完成多源交叉核验

基于锚点的持续适应认证行为保留

arXiv:2610.40740v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continual adaptation requires deciding not only how to update a model, but whether to commit an update without exceeding a declared budget for changes to protected behavior. We introduce Certified Anchor-Based Adaptation (CABA), a candidate-agnostic post-update gate that reserves historical observations from candidate optimization, compares old and candidate policies on frozen representations, and selects the largest tested interpolation coefficient whose worst-anchor forward KL divergence remains within budget. The finite check requires neither action labels nor complete trajectories. We develop a theory-led certification framework that separates measured anchor retention from conditional off-anchor guarantees. Under explicit representation-coverage and Lipschitz assumptions, an accepted update satisfies a uniform behavioral-divergence bound on protected support. The analysis gives regularity bounds for affine softmax heads, probabilistic coverage and compression guarantees, interpolation monotonicity conditions, grid-resolution bounds, and trajectory-level and sequential-composition guarantees. In a controlled UCI Human Activity Recognition study used as a non-stationary sensor-policy proxy, CABA reduces mean forgetting from 1.01 percent for unconstrained adaptation to 0.00 percent at budget epsilon = 0.05, while reducing final average accuracy from 93.04 percent to 88.48 percent. The experiment illustrates a retention-plasticity trade-off and does not establish foundation-model or robotic performance. CABA provides an auditable retention check for candidate generators exposing comparable policy distributions and a declared update path, while deployment also requires separate evidence of current-task utility.

Evidence

来源与证据

单一来源 · 1 个信源

当前仅有一个可用来源,尚未完成多源交叉核验。

发布时间
内容处理
AI 翻译 / 摘要,需结合原文核对
内容有误或来源失效?告诉我们

每天早上收到这 5 条

免注册,填邮箱即可;每封邮件都能一键退订。

提交即表示同意按隐私说明保存你的邮箱,只用于发送简报。

或用 RSS 订阅

AI 翻译、摘要和解读仅用于辅助判断;涉及重要决策时,请回到上方来源核实。