跳到正文
认知
返回认知精选
认知精选AI论文大约 10 小时前4
单一来源当前只有一个可用来源,尚未完成多源交叉核验

语义条件相似性(SCS):一种形式化数学框架

arXiv:2611.08778v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) operates on document pairs, returning a single scalar per comparison. In a multi-document setting where several sources may have contributed to one or more targets, pairwise STS cannot disentangle each source's marginal semantic contribution from their shared vocabulary. In this paper, Semantic Conditional Similarity (SCS) is introduced as a conditional form of STS that computes similarity between two documents after eliminating semantic elements shared with a third via set-theoretic operations. SCS makes four contributions: 1) it introduces directionality, partitioning pairwise relations into lateral (inter-source) and vertical (source-to-target) classes; 2) conditioning induces role-dependent asymmetry by extending the comparison domain from unordered pairs to ordered, conditioned triples of a target, a reference, and a conditioning document; 3) SCS introduces inter-document conditioning by subtracting shared content from a third document, complementing the intra-document conditioning in recent C-STS work; and 4) the set-theoretic decomposition achieves threshold-free partitioning of shared and residual content, requiring no arbitrary similarity cutoff. Although developed for the $n \to 1$ configuration, the framework extends to $1 \to n$ via vertical role reversal and to $m \to n$ via independent composition of source- and target-side conditioning. With the established $1 \to 1$ case, these span the full spectrum of document cardinality. SCS scores should be interpreted ordinally, as rankings of marginal contributions rather than absolute measurements. The broader implication is that metric space axioms commonly assumed in similarity formalizations constrain expressiveness in role-differentiated multi-document settings, and that extending the domain to conditioned triples can recover information that pairwise-symmetric comparisons suppress.

Evidence

来源与证据

单一来源 · 1 个信源

当前仅有一个可用来源,尚未完成多源交叉核验。

发布时间
内容处理
AI 翻译 / 摘要,需结合原文核对
内容有误或来源失效?告诉我们

每天早上收到这 5 条

免注册,填邮箱即可;每封邮件都能一键退订。

提交即表示同意按隐私说明保存你的邮箱,只用于发送简报。

或用 RSS 订阅

AI 翻译、摘要和解读仅用于辅助判断;涉及重要决策时,请回到上方来源核实。