单一来源
当前只有一个可用来源,尚未完成多源交叉核验如何驾驭存在主义流浪欲
“Wander where you will over all the world, from every valley seeing forever new hills calling you to climb them, from every mountain top farther peaks enticing you… until you stand one day on the last peak on the border of the interminable sea, stopped by the finality of that.” “Man* is by Nature a migratory animal,” the elderly Frederick Douglass reflected in an 1887 speech about his global travels. “It does not appear that he was intended to dwell forever in any one locality. He is a born traveler.” A generation after him, Maya Angelou observed that “you only are free when you realize you belong no place — you belong every place — no place at all.” Partway in time between Douglass and Angelou, the painter, printmaker, and philosopher Rockwell Kent (June 21, 1882–March 13, 1971) captured this vital interplay between freedom and belonging, between nature and human nature, in the preface to Wilderness (public library) — the exquisite record of the seven months he spent on a remote Alaskan island with his young son in the gloaming hour of the Spanish flu pandemic and the First World War, at the dawn of his artistic life. Moonlight, Winter by Rockwell Kent. (Available as a print and as stationery cards.) We each have a particular style of wanderlust, pulled by particular types of nature that best speak to our own — those places where we most freely lose ourselves and, in consequence, find ourselves. For some, they are the austere open space of blue skies and red canyons. For me, they are the mossy old-growth forests of New Zealand and the American Pacific Northwest. For Kent, it was the severe majesty of the Great North: It has always been hard for me to understand myself, to know why I work and love and live. Yet it is fortunate that such matters find a way of caring for themselves. I came to Alaska because I love the North. I crave snow-topped mountains, dreary wastes, and the cruel Northern sea with its hard horizons at the edge of the world where infinite space begins. Here skies are clearer and deeper and, for the greater wonders they reveal, a thousand times more eloquent of the eternal mystery than those of softer lands. In a new preface to his journals, penned in the final year of his life, Kent looks back on the wanderlust of his youth — the roaming restlessness that had shaped his spirit, the spirit from which his art sprang, the art that established him as one of the most celebrated creators of his time — and exhorts the generations of wanderers to come: Wander where you will over all the world, from every valley seeing forever new hills calling you to climb them, from every mountain top farther peaks enticing you. Always the distant land looks fairest, till you are made at last a restless wanderer never reaching home — never — until you stand one day on the last peak on the border of the interminable sea, stopped by the finality of that. The Star-Lighter by Rockwell Kent, 1919. (Available as a print and as stationery cards.) Contemplating the existential pull beneath it all — the rippling, resonant why of our wanderlust — Kent adds: We are part and parcel of the big plan of things. We are simply instruments recording in different measure our particular portion of the infinite. And what we absorb of it makes for character, and what we give forth, for [our art]. These are salutary words to read a century later, as our own world is only just shaking off its straitjacket of two-year terror and becoming wanderable again. Complement with Rebecca Solnit’s wanderlusting history of walking, then revisit Kent’s breathtaking reflections on wilderness, solitude, and creativity. donating = lovingFor seventeen years, I have been spending hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars each month composing The Marginalian (which bore the outgrown name Brain Pickings for its first fifteen years). It has remained free and ad-free and alive thanks to patronage from readers. I have no staff, no interns, no assistant — a thoroughly one-woman labor of love that is also my life and my livelihood. If this labor makes your own life more livable in any way, please consider lending a helping hand with a donation. Your support makes all the difference. newsletter The Marginalian has a free weekly newsletter. It comes out on Sundays and offers the week’s most inspiring reading. Here’s what to expect. Like? Sign up.
Evidence
来源与证据
当前仅有一个可用来源,尚未完成多源交叉核验。
- 发布时间
- 内容处理
- AI 翻译 / 摘要,需结合原文核对
相关资讯
第一批生意遇冷的婚庆,想转型去做“离婚仪式”
本文来自微信公众号: 新周刊 ,作者:张远山,编辑:Felicia婚庆行业持续不景气,而“离婚仪式”这门生意似乎成为某条新赛道。但人们真的愿意为告别付费吗?十几年前的电影《非诚勿扰2》里,葛优饰演的秦奋主持了一场荒诞的离婚典礼——红毯、誓词、戒指交还一应俱全,末了还笑着道一句“散买卖,不散交情”。当时,观众大概只当这是导演的黑色幽默,没人把这当回事。十几年过去,当年的电影桥段,反倒似乎成为眼下婚庆行业寒冬里被不少人盯上的“新赛道”。往年国庆黄金周,是婚庆行业一年里最热闹的“丰收档”——酒店宴会厅排期满,摄影师连轴转,全国人民扎堆办喜事。但在今年,画风似乎发生了明显转变。根据民政部今年二季度统计
红绿相争,腰部短剧APP夹缝求生
本文来自微信公众号: 骨朵 ,作者:GuDuo骨朵编辑部国内短剧江湖的“一红一绿”,不仅领跑用户大盘,也集中了所有的舆论焦点。从第三方数据榜单,到媒体报道,甚至是平台发言人微博,红果和绿泡泡毫无疑问是主角。与之形成鲜明对比的是,一众腰部短剧APP正逐渐淡出用户视野。近期,QuestMobile发布的一张榜单直观展现出腰部短剧APP的生存现状,月活规模被头部断层式碾压,单月月活跃用户规模甚至比不过短剧小程序。敌不过红果的算法生态,也输给了绿泡泡的零下载成本。当下还要关注腰部平台,或许不在于预测谁有实力加入红绿之争,而在于以它们为样本,观察整个短剧行业生态的演变。值得追问的是:绿泡泡的快速崛起,给
对短剧的批评,有多少来自精英的俯视?
本文来自微信公众号: 大橘财经 ,作者:刘媛媛短剧行业的火药味,最近有点浓。近日,一名前媒体人与抖音集团副总裁围绕短剧的公开争论,以前者提起诉讼、后者表示积极应诉而进入法律程序。表面看,这是一场关于“字节时间”数据口径的争执,但往深里看,前者的核心判断落在了“短剧让人变笨”“社会成本高昂”上,后者则强调“短剧内核是积极正确的价值观”“用户用脚投票”。在观察者网看来,短短两三年,短剧就聚拢起数亿观众,发育成一个庞大的新兴产业,足以说明短剧存在有其合理性。这个时候,比“该不该存在”更值得回答的问题,是“如何让它更好地生长”。真正负责任的态度,不是在“捧杀”与“棒杀”之间选边站队,而是分清哪些是成长
AI陪伴,为什么有的做App,有的做玩具,有的做机器人?
本文来自微信公众号: 倔牛聊陪伴AI ,作者:倔牛聊陪伴AI陪伴Agent研究·第一季「从聊天到陪伴」·第03篇如果今天让你开发一款AI陪伴产品,你会把它做成什么样?一个随时可以打开的聊天App?一个有性格、有形象的虚拟人物?一只可以放在桌上、抱在怀里的AI宠物?还是一个能够主动和人交流、参与日常生活的机器人?在国内,我们已经看到星野、猫箱、BubblePal、芙崽等不同形态的产品。在海外,Replika、Character.AI、日本的LOVOT,以及面向老年人的ElliQ,也探索出了不同的陪伴方式。这些产品的共同点,是试图让人工智能与人建立超越简单问答的互动。但它们对于「陪伴应该是什么样」
AI 翻译、摘要和解读仅用于辅助判断;涉及重要决策时,请回到上方来源核实。